Case study

Published April 2026

Is it worth filling a north-facing roof?

"Is it worth filling a north-facing roof? The installers want over £6k to add roughly 12 panels to the north. I already have 10 panels, a 3.6 kW inverter and a 10 kWh battery on the south-facing side."

Introduction

If you already have a solid south-facing solar setup, filling the north-facing roof can sound like an obvious next step. The real question, though, is not whether the extra panels will generate more electricity, but whether spending a bit over £6,000 on roughly 12 more panels is enough to make a worthwhile financial difference.

In this case, the home already has 10 south-facing panels, a 3.6 kW inverter, and a 10 kWh battery. That matters because the existing system is already doing a lot of the work. For this level of household electricity demand, the results suggest the added north-facing array mainly increases export rather than delivering a big jump in on-site savings.

These reports were modelled using our solar calculator: open the free Solar Butter solar calculator, which is free to use with no sign up required.

Baseline Model

Inputs

  • 10 south-facing panels at 4.5 kW
  • 3.6 kW Sunsynk inverter
  • 10 kWh battery
  • 3,500 kWh/year household demand
  • Fixed tariff: 28p import, 12p export, 60p/day standing charge
Historic simulation report page 1 showing the current south-facing solar and battery system summary.
Current system report, page 1. The key numbers are a £1,072 annual benefit, 4,990 kWh of solar generation, and 85.6% self-consumption of annual load.
Historic simulation report page 2 showing the yearly summary for the current system.
Current system report, page 2. The yearly summary reinforces that the system is already covering a large share of household demand.

Outputs

  • 4,990 kWh annual solar generation
  • 504 kWh grid import
  • 1,938 kWh grid export
  • 85.6% self-consumption
  • About £1,072/year solar-and-battery benefit
  • Modelled bill of about £127/year

Optimisation Model

Inputs

  • Keep the existing south-facing array and 10 kWh battery
  • Add roughly 12 north-facing panels
  • North-facing array sized at about 5.3 kW
  • Upgrade inverter from 3.6 kW to 5 kW
  • Same fixed tariff and household demand assumptions
Historic simulation report page 1 showing the north-facing roof upgrade summary.
Upgrade report, page 1. The main gain is higher annual generation and export, not a huge jump in self-consumed household value.
Historic simulation report page 2 showing the yearly summary for the north-facing roof upgrade.
Upgrade report, page 2. The second page shows the same story in yearly profile form: more total energy, but much of it pushed outward rather than used on site.

Outputs

  • 8,062 kWh annual solar generation
  • 277 kWh grid import
  • 4,779 kWh grid export
  • About £1,476/year total benefit
  • About £404/year uplift versus the baseline model

Comparison

Current system

£1,072/year benefit

4,990 kWh generated, 504 kWh imported, 1,938 kWh exported.

North-facing upgrade

£1,476/year benefit

8,062 kWh generated, 277 kWh imported, 4,779 kWh exported.

Incremental uplift

About £404/year

Most of the uplift comes from extra generation and export rather than major load reduction.

Install?

Most of the value comes from export.

The period may be around 15 to 20 years, but depends heavily on how long the export tariff remains.

Alexander Kitt, author

About the author

Alexander Kitt | MEng (Hons), Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham

A software engineer with experience at two start-up renewable energy companies Noriker Power and Levelise, having expertise in systems modelling, data analysis, heat transfer and engineering.

He has developed commercial software for domestic battery optimisation and energy-flexibility applications and around 9 years experience as a software engineer.

View on LinkedIn